From the other side of the pond
A short while ago, this blog noted the clash of cultures when one cricket team in India introduced American-style cheerleaders. This excellent column takes the debate further, in questioning first, why the cheerleaders differ from the degrading sexual escapades currently emanating from "Bollywood," and secondly, whether such promiscuity in general is helpful to women overall:
Indian sexuality — in films, advertisements, magazines, public discourse — is today as unapologetically raunchy as anywhere else in the world. And maybe that’s what’s at the heart of the cheerleaders debate — and it’s a point that we have all entirely missed. Is manufactured sexuality really a mark of liberation for women? Or have we just internalised all the worst clichés of post- feminist clap-trap in the name of emancipation?
In our attempt to break Indian women free from the conventional orthodoxy of right-wing moralists, have we just replaced one kind of stereotype with another? And with one that is as oppressive and unforgiving?
She argues her way into the classical liberal trap that says that 1. any restriction on speech or behaviour is reprehensible; and 2. any idea that aligns a theoretician with "right-wing moralists" has to be eschewed out of hand. Thus she has to defend freedom to be trashy, abortion on demand, and women's liberation in all forms; no wonder that she finds herself stewing about "raunch culture" in all its glory.
Hey, if "moralism" is your unequivocal enemy, then anything goes. That would be your "cul-de-sac of choice," my friend.


Comments