This turn of events in Canada brings to mind a recent interview for U.S. Catholic (which may not have produced my best answers, but got me thinking.) First the latest item:
The Conservative government is taking an axe to Status of Women Canada, closing three-quarters of its regional offices and outraging critics in the process. Heritage Minister Bev Oda revealed Wednesday that 12 of the federal agency's 16 regional offices will be shut down by April 1.
The blow is part of a cost-cutting program announced in September that will see the agency lose $5-million from it's $23-million annual budget over two years. Status of Women Canada works to advance women's economic equality and human rights and eliminate violence against women.
Of course feminists are outraged, blah, blah, blah.
Liberal MP Maria Minna called the move “reprehensible.”
“Canadian women are still only earning 71 cents to every dollar earned by their male counterparts, more and more women are living in poverty, and we are still waiting for the government to create child-care spaces,” she said. With the closure of these regional offices, the government is taking away one of the very few remaining resources for women.”
Well, there are ways to help women other than handing them enormous sums of money to patch their wounds using methods that ignore the foundation of their problems. Rape crisis centres, lawyers, and child-care facilities are stop-gap measures that only leave the root causes unaddressed.
Thus, back to the interview, one of the questions was, "Do you consider yourself a feminist?" The answer, after much thought, was No, for the following reasons:
- "Feminism" as a term is loaded with thirty years of baggage that is difficult to sort out in the short amount of time (or space) that we're usually offered to present our world view. Rather than staking a claim about its meaning, let it go and we'll use other terms.
- The concept of "feminism" is to promote women's causes and interests, which of course vary wildly from radical feminists opinions to those of radical Muslims to those of many back-woods "build-a-god[dess]" clans.
- Holy Mother Church never sees the advancement of human dignity as a zero-sum game. When men purify themselves and live virtue, the effects spill over to everyone. Likewise, when women are freed to live authentically feminine lives, men and children benefit, as does the entire Mystical Body of Christ. The complementarity of the sexes teaches us that in the nuptial reality in which we all live and move and have our being, one cannot be myopic. For the sake of an apostolate, one can focus on one piece in the puzzle in order to strengthen its ability to "become itself," but ultimately we must all must keep the universal mission of mankind in mind.
- Specifically, one dark side of feminism has been to pit women against children, women against men, and women against women who don't share the same world view. Women must be bridges of unity and transparent images of the bride, who points mankind to the Bridegroom.
Let's drop "feminism" -- even "Christian feminism" and promote authentic femininity as a service to the world at large.
Comments
“People have realized that the complete removal of the feminine element from the Christian message is a shortcoming from an anthropological viewpoint. It is theologically and anthropologically important for woman to be at the center of Christianity."
This is just another of the unintended consequences of the cultural acceptance of contraception and abortion! Men's sexuality has been robbed of its creative essence. It is now viewed as something that imposes a burden on women (when conception happens to occur), something used to control women or something that is purely recreational. Why would men bother?? In taking away their responsibility, we've also robbed them of their significance! In the big picture of humanity, men have been made into nothing more than a nuisance women have to figure out how to control in order to bring about the next generation. Men don't see it as their task to protect the vulnerable because they see themselves as the vulnerable ones. A few well preserved vials of sperm would make men entirely obsolete in the world's ethos today!!
That is astounding Robin, and good for you for standing up. At the heart of that matter, I think, is even worse than a gender mixing message. There is an increased sharper and sharper focus on the "self." Solid Catholic teaching returns our focus away from ourselves to Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The original sin, Eve denied her womanhood when she desired to be like "gods." Since the only god she knew was the Father. Where was Adam? He stood impotent... in other words, they were divorced. There's a young girl at Robin's son's high school who was just told that she is the center of the universe and it's a tragic disservice to her.
Ditto what Mary said! A lot of high schools have very poor math and science depts, for boys and girls. I also am educated as a chemical engineer, but chose to teach the two years before we had children because its hours were more suited to spending time with children. (I was looking ahead). When it came time and I was pregnant with our first, I realized that I did not want to leave him with someone else, and was able to stay home full time. I am not sure it would have been that easy if we were used to another engineering income and not just a private school teacher income. Also some of my first job offers were out on oil rigs - I had no interest in that at all even though I enjoyed my engineering classes and did well in them. No one discouraged me from an engineering job, on the contrary I got a lot of flack for my decision not to pursue an engineering career.
I've been lurking, but this is one that irritates me. Beats the heck out of me what these "barriers" are. I was educated as a chemical engineer, where 1/3 of our class was women. However, in electrical engineering, only 1 or 2 out of 30 were women. Is it possible that women are Just Not Interested in some areas? Nah, it must be The Man keeping us down so we must legislate (and, I agree -- when they say "legistlate", I hear "quota"). And actually, I have a friend that was also a chemical engineer. When she lost her job, she decided not to go back into engineering and started working from home so she could spend more time with her 3 kids. Also, if nothing else, there are all kinds of incentives for women to enter science and engineering -- scholarships not available to men, guaranteed housing on campuses that do not guarantee housing to the general population, etc. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that schools in general are not preparing students for the hard sciences. It is truly a sad state of affairs, the lack of science education these days.