I didn't realise that a small brawl had ensued after the publication of an article on Catholic Exchange. I had announced the Vatican initiative to celebrate Mulieris Dignitatem next year and had pulled some quotes from the document. My thesis for years has been that many women have been coopted by a variety of lies that undermine their dignity and that it is their responsibility to pray, study, and reject these lies.
Examples would be that contraception is liberating, abortion is necessary, adopting the male models of overwork and uncommitted sex makes life more interesting (and I mean the models that are not even authentically masculine, but are corruptions of masculinity), and that the Church is a patriarchy whose mission undermines the aspirations of women, etc. There are two options for women in the face of these lies:
1. the hierarchy of the Church, the men in their lives, or legal structures could combine to take these options away from women (abortion, contraception, and the choices they make possible with work and entertainment). Now it's a near metaphysical certainty that no laws will contrain these options, but husbands could join with the Church to come down hard on women to "make them see;" -OR-
2. women could take each other by the hand, share stories, weep over injustices and bad experiences and commit themselves to pursuing lives that respect all life and enhance the dignity of authentic femininity.
Now the argument circles around the responsibility that men have to get us out of this morass. Of course men are called to chastity, to honour women, to safeguard life, to preserve marital bonds. OF COURSE! No one who promotes this message ever says that men are without responsibility in this. The essential difference is that women are packaged in many ways that degrade them, reduce them to playthings, and undermine their welfare. Thus it is women who have to stop this from happening.
Of course men should stop consuming porn, looking at women with lust in their hearts, and misunderstanding the sexual embrace. But women have to take the lead -- by refusing to participate in porn (on any level), by refusing to dress provocatively (which causes men to have lust on the brain), and by insisting that the sexual embrace be reserved for marriage. Women have this, er, power (I don't like that word) but they are capable of making the difference. And as the good men said at Vatican II:
But the hour is coming, in fact has come, when the vocation of woman is being achieved in its fullness, the hour in which woman acquires in the world an influence, an effect, and a power never hitherto achieved. That is why, at this moment, when the human race is undergoing so deep a transformation, women impregnated with the spirit of the gospel can do much to aid mankind in not falling.
Comments
“People have realized that the complete removal of the feminine element from the Christian message is a shortcoming from an anthropological viewpoint. It is theologically and anthropologically important for woman to be at the center of Christianity."
This is just another of the unintended consequences of the cultural acceptance of contraception and abortion! Men's sexuality has been robbed of its creative essence. It is now viewed as something that imposes a burden on women (when conception happens to occur), something used to control women or something that is purely recreational. Why would men bother?? In taking away their responsibility, we've also robbed them of their significance! In the big picture of humanity, men have been made into nothing more than a nuisance women have to figure out how to control in order to bring about the next generation. Men don't see it as their task to protect the vulnerable because they see themselves as the vulnerable ones. A few well preserved vials of sperm would make men entirely obsolete in the world's ethos today!!
That is astounding Robin, and good for you for standing up. At the heart of that matter, I think, is even worse than a gender mixing message. There is an increased sharper and sharper focus on the "self." Solid Catholic teaching returns our focus away from ourselves to Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The original sin, Eve denied her womanhood when she desired to be like "gods." Since the only god she knew was the Father. Where was Adam? He stood impotent... in other words, they were divorced. There's a young girl at Robin's son's high school who was just told that she is the center of the universe and it's a tragic disservice to her.
Ditto what Mary said! A lot of high schools have very poor math and science depts, for boys and girls. I also am educated as a chemical engineer, but chose to teach the two years before we had children because its hours were more suited to spending time with children. (I was looking ahead). When it came time and I was pregnant with our first, I realized that I did not want to leave him with someone else, and was able to stay home full time. I am not sure it would have been that easy if we were used to another engineering income and not just a private school teacher income. Also some of my first job offers were out on oil rigs - I had no interest in that at all even though I enjoyed my engineering classes and did well in them. No one discouraged me from an engineering job, on the contrary I got a lot of flack for my decision not to pursue an engineering career.
I've been lurking, but this is one that irritates me. Beats the heck out of me what these "barriers" are. I was educated as a chemical engineer, where 1/3 of our class was women. However, in electrical engineering, only 1 or 2 out of 30 were women. Is it possible that women are Just Not Interested in some areas? Nah, it must be The Man keeping us down so we must legislate (and, I agree -- when they say "legistlate", I hear "quota"). And actually, I have a friend that was also a chemical engineer. When she lost her job, she decided not to go back into engineering and started working from home so she could spend more time with her 3 kids. Also, if nothing else, there are all kinds of incentives for women to enter science and engineering -- scholarships not available to men, guaranteed housing on campuses that do not guarantee housing to the general population, etc. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that schools in general are not preparing students for the hard sciences. It is truly a sad state of affairs, the lack of science education these days.