Wonderful church-lady dedicates decades to filial piety and charitable projects. Upon her death at age 75, a minister at her church is rummaging through her personal items and discovers that her earlier years were spent on-stage, touring, and singing. What to do at the funeral?
"[R]eading through the cuttings it has become apparent just how big a star she really was. She became a Bluebell girl, toured Europe and even appeared on stage at the Windmill Theatre. One cutting shows she also appeared on stage at Sheffield's Lyceum Theatre.
"Afterwards she settled in Italy where she went on to become a major jazz star. She lived in Milan and appeared on stage and TV, and had a number one hit. I am currently trying to get this digitally reworked so it can be played at her funeral.
Ahem. If she didn't tell anyone, perhaps there was a reason. While there is no indication that any of her past involved objective sin, it is entirely possible that she wanted to be remembered for her faith. To leave such a past behind, as in really behind, indicates that the present was sufficient and that her faith in God and His promises for the future sufficed.
Remarkable how the religious body in question is spinning this in the wrong direction. She could be a remarkable testament to the fact that Christ Jesus is far more important than the shabby pleasures of the world, but it would seem that even her minister thinks that the faith community would be far more tickled to see photos of her legs and a recording of an old song.
"Zoe was very precious to us. But she never boasted about her past life. She was obviously profoundly gifted. She was very glamorous - had long hair that was always tied back, and always looked very nice."
Bass ackward, as some would say. I'd say her gifts in the latter years trumped the pony-tail.
Comments
“People have realized that the complete removal of the feminine element from the Christian message is a shortcoming from an anthropological viewpoint. It is theologically and anthropologically important for woman to be at the center of Christianity."
This is just another of the unintended consequences of the cultural acceptance of contraception and abortion! Men's sexuality has been robbed of its creative essence. It is now viewed as something that imposes a burden on women (when conception happens to occur), something used to control women or something that is purely recreational. Why would men bother?? In taking away their responsibility, we've also robbed them of their significance! In the big picture of humanity, men have been made into nothing more than a nuisance women have to figure out how to control in order to bring about the next generation. Men don't see it as their task to protect the vulnerable because they see themselves as the vulnerable ones. A few well preserved vials of sperm would make men entirely obsolete in the world's ethos today!!
That is astounding Robin, and good for you for standing up. At the heart of that matter, I think, is even worse than a gender mixing message. There is an increased sharper and sharper focus on the "self." Solid Catholic teaching returns our focus away from ourselves to Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The original sin, Eve denied her womanhood when she desired to be like "gods." Since the only god she knew was the Father. Where was Adam? He stood impotent... in other words, they were divorced. There's a young girl at Robin's son's high school who was just told that she is the center of the universe and it's a tragic disservice to her.
Ditto what Mary said! A lot of high schools have very poor math and science depts, for boys and girls. I also am educated as a chemical engineer, but chose to teach the two years before we had children because its hours were more suited to spending time with children. (I was looking ahead). When it came time and I was pregnant with our first, I realized that I did not want to leave him with someone else, and was able to stay home full time. I am not sure it would have been that easy if we were used to another engineering income and not just a private school teacher income. Also some of my first job offers were out on oil rigs - I had no interest in that at all even though I enjoyed my engineering classes and did well in them. No one discouraged me from an engineering job, on the contrary I got a lot of flack for my decision not to pursue an engineering career.
I've been lurking, but this is one that irritates me. Beats the heck out of me what these "barriers" are. I was educated as a chemical engineer, where 1/3 of our class was women. However, in electrical engineering, only 1 or 2 out of 30 were women. Is it possible that women are Just Not Interested in some areas? Nah, it must be The Man keeping us down so we must legislate (and, I agree -- when they say "legistlate", I hear "quota"). And actually, I have a friend that was also a chemical engineer. When she lost her job, she decided not to go back into engineering and started working from home so she could spend more time with her 3 kids. Also, if nothing else, there are all kinds of incentives for women to enter science and engineering -- scholarships not available to men, guaranteed housing on campuses that do not guarantee housing to the general population, etc. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that schools in general are not preparing students for the hard sciences. It is truly a sad state of affairs, the lack of science education these days.