Fawzya Gailani says her husband beat her when she won a seat in Afghanistan's parliament. He was jealous that she won more than 14,000 votes in the country's first parliamentary election in 2005, while he only polled 160.
"He hadn't really beat me very often before then," she told AFP of the man she was forced to marry at age 14. "But he was so jealous that he beat me a few times. I left soon afterwards and I've never been back."
The Taliban have been waging an insurgency in Afghanistan for almost nine years and this month said anyone associated with the elections is a target. At least three candidates have been killed since campaigning began in June. Officials say women are the most vulnerable to Taliban violence, many receiving regular death threats, and New York-based Human Rights Watch said last week: "Women candidates are facing the highest level of intimidation."
Gailani is confident of retaining her seat but her victory will have come at huge personal cost. In late August, five of her campaign workers were kidnapped by the Taliban, she said, and shot dead. Four were relatives -- three cousins and a brother-in-law. The Taliban claimed responsibility.
While grieving the loss of her team members, Gailani is unwavering in her commitment to the cause that elevated her to political power -- that of Afghan women, whom campaigners say are among the most oppressed and abused people in the world.
While the post-Taliban constitution guarantees women such rights as education and employment outside the home, in reality many continue to be treated as chattels and slaves in the name of religion and tradition. Anecdotal examples abound of young women betrothed as toddlers, exchanged for animals or to pay debts, beaten and raped by their husbands, jailed by their families for refusing arranged marriages, murdered for the family's "honour", becoming mothers as soon as their bodies are ready, barred from leaving their homes.
The Taliban's five-year rule, which ended with a US-led invasion in 2001, was marked by general repression that was particularly brutal to women. Girls were not permitted to go to school -- and even now are sometimes attacked and their schools destroyed by extremists. Women were not allowed out unless accompanied by a male relative and wearing a burqa. They were attacked in the street for such perceived crimes as wearing white shoes and rape victims were publicly executed as adulterers.
Even today, women who become politically active face death threats and some have been murdered or forced into exile. Gailani likens the fight for women's rights to a war in which the other side, men and mullahs, have all the firepower. "From the first day I decided to enter politics, I have felt I have been on the frontline of a war for women's rights," she said, tears welling.
"This is a very emotional issue for me because women in Afghanistan suffer so much. If a woman is killed or kills herself, is locked up by her family or sets herself on fire because things are so bad, it is all the same -- she dies. Being killed is normal for Afghan women. If I am killed because I am a woman politician, it is all the same."
Gailani, 40, was her husband's second wife and had her "first child at 15 and one every year after that. I had ten children, six are still alive".
She shares fears that after nine years of insurgency, President Hamid Karzai's plans to pursue peace talks with the insurgent leadership could see women's rights traded for an end to the war. "If the Afghan Taliban accept our constitution, respect the law and equality between men and women, then this will be acceptable. But we know that won't happen. It is not possible for such animals to suddenly become human beings.
"If Karzai wants to play political games, using women's rights and human rights as his toys, then this will not be acceptable. I do not trust either Karzai or the Taliban and I have said so in parliament," she said.
"My request is that we live like all human beings, that women have the same rights under the law as all people. It is my duty to keep on fighting, and if I die doing it, then that is just the fate of a normal Afghan woman," she said.
I don't know what the future holds for Afghanistan or if the American-led effort can bring about real change for Afghani women, but let's pray that we choose wisely when we have the chance and help where we can.
Comments
“People have realized that the complete removal of the feminine element from the Christian message is a shortcoming from an anthropological viewpoint. It is theologically and anthropologically important for woman to be at the center of Christianity."
This is just another of the unintended consequences of the cultural acceptance of contraception and abortion! Men's sexuality has been robbed of its creative essence. It is now viewed as something that imposes a burden on women (when conception happens to occur), something used to control women or something that is purely recreational. Why would men bother?? In taking away their responsibility, we've also robbed them of their significance! In the big picture of humanity, men have been made into nothing more than a nuisance women have to figure out how to control in order to bring about the next generation. Men don't see it as their task to protect the vulnerable because they see themselves as the vulnerable ones. A few well preserved vials of sperm would make men entirely obsolete in the world's ethos today!!
That is astounding Robin, and good for you for standing up. At the heart of that matter, I think, is even worse than a gender mixing message. There is an increased sharper and sharper focus on the "self." Solid Catholic teaching returns our focus away from ourselves to Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The original sin, Eve denied her womanhood when she desired to be like "gods." Since the only god she knew was the Father. Where was Adam? He stood impotent... in other words, they were divorced. There's a young girl at Robin's son's high school who was just told that she is the center of the universe and it's a tragic disservice to her.
Ditto what Mary said! A lot of high schools have very poor math and science depts, for boys and girls. I also am educated as a chemical engineer, but chose to teach the two years before we had children because its hours were more suited to spending time with children. (I was looking ahead). When it came time and I was pregnant with our first, I realized that I did not want to leave him with someone else, and was able to stay home full time. I am not sure it would have been that easy if we were used to another engineering income and not just a private school teacher income. Also some of my first job offers were out on oil rigs - I had no interest in that at all even though I enjoyed my engineering classes and did well in them. No one discouraged me from an engineering job, on the contrary I got a lot of flack for my decision not to pursue an engineering career.
I've been lurking, but this is one that irritates me. Beats the heck out of me what these "barriers" are. I was educated as a chemical engineer, where 1/3 of our class was women. However, in electrical engineering, only 1 or 2 out of 30 were women. Is it possible that women are Just Not Interested in some areas? Nah, it must be The Man keeping us down so we must legislate (and, I agree -- when they say "legistlate", I hear "quota"). And actually, I have a friend that was also a chemical engineer. When she lost her job, she decided not to go back into engineering and started working from home so she could spend more time with her 3 kids. Also, if nothing else, there are all kinds of incentives for women to enter science and engineering -- scholarships not available to men, guaranteed housing on campuses that do not guarantee housing to the general population, etc. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that schools in general are not preparing students for the hard sciences. It is truly a sad state of affairs, the lack of science education these days.