feminine-genius

Shocker: men and women not interchangeable

This is an important reminder on the reasons why drafting women will be disastrous:

Unchanging physical differences between the sexes will always render women at a stark disadvantage in offensive kill missions. In the Marines’ testing, women suffered 2-6 times the injuries of their male counterparts. Active-duty women average 2-10 times the injuries compared to men before even attempting to achieve men’s standards or the combat arms’ much more grueling demands. It should go without saying that higher rates of injury are a liability to units that have to endure and withstand the toughest physical demands as they hunt and kill our enemies. Drafting women for this will result in much higher turnover, weakened combat effectiveness and fewer of both men and women coming home alive and victorious against our enemies.

Even when the best women were paired with men in a recent Marine integration study, the results showed that readiness, effectiveness, and success rates plummeted, not to mention the women sustained far greater injuries. One might ponder the real strategy of putting women into combat: the prospect of dead mothers will be a deterrent to any battle; diminished fighting capacity will cause the CIC to reconsider many deployments; and distracted and demoralised troops will discourage many from considering a military career -- which combine to undermine American interests around the world and encourage our enemies.

Which is a win-win for those who disparage all that our civilisation stands for -- check out the standard texts for Gender Study departments nationwide. "Men wage wars" has been their mantra for decades. Stacking the troops with those who will undermine troop effectiveness promotes androgyny as the antidote while simply replacing testosterone with estrogen. Which wages "peace" as a façade for capitulation. 

Social engineering based on delusions

This is an important piece by Stella Morabito, who is an expert in agitprop:

The transgender movement has never been about “gender.” It’s all about sex. Sex is the real target. “Gender” is merely the politicized linguistic vehicle that facilitates a legal ban on sex distinctions. There aren’t a whole lot of dots to connect to uncover the logic of where this leads: if you abolish sex distinctions in law, you can abolish state recognition of biological family ties, and the state can regulate personal relationships and consolidate power as never before.

I had the privilege of meeting Stella last week, and hearing her explain how propaganda works. Its goal is to:

1. prevent independent thought;
2. mobilise the masses; and
3. build conformity.

If anyone has any doubts as to these goals, he simply needs to watch these bright young things (here and here). But - here's the kicker - when the propaganda is light years away from reality, then it will take enormous force to keep the ideology in place. Since gender ideology only exists in the mind (and note that the students filmed above were happy to let the average-height male Caucasian interviewer identify as a 6'5" Chinese woman if he so wished) it is illusory, and one person's illusion may conflict not only with reality but with the competing illusions of their peers. As Stella notes:

What will happen when all of society is sexless in both language and law? If the law does not recognize your body as physically male or female—applying only the word “gender” to your internal, self-reported self-perception—does the law even recognize your body? Every single cell of you has either “male” or “female” written into its DNA, but the law refuses to recognize such categories. Such laws will only recognize an infinite, immeasurable “gender spectrum,” your place on which is determined only by your mind. So what exactly are you after the law has de-sexed you? In what sense is your body a legal entity?

And what happens to your familial relationships after the law has de-sexed you? Are they legally recognized? I don’t see how they could be. Certainly not by default, certainly not by the recognition that each child comes through the union of two opposite-sex parents.

In a society de-sexed by law, would the state recognize your relationship as a husband or a wife? Mother or father? Daughter or son? Those are all sexed terms. A system that does not recognize the existence of male and female would be free to ignore the parentage of any child. You might be recognized as your child’s “legal guardian,” but only if the state agrees to that.

Putting the state in charge of an illusion-based construct is frightening, and what may look liberating today will be the cinderblock tied to our ankles in the very near future. Caveat emptor!

Gender dysphoria

This is the first part of a two-part conversation with Dr Michelle Cretella, the president of the American College of Pediatricians.

American College of Pediatricians

Courage

Mercatornet article: Gender Ideology = Child Abuse

UPDATE: this is part two of the conversation with Dr Cretella