Amsterdam has long been associated with libertinism, and it's that very reputation which creates the tourist draw, lining the city's coffers with euros, dollars, rupees, yen, and other forms of quantifiable exchanges. Besides the freedom to imbibe drugs, what are the tourists looking for?
[P]rostitutes posing and preening in their windows are a huge draw for visitors. This weekend, the roads and alleys, lined with old-fashion street-lamps, were packed with tourists from all over the world.
Outside the Casa Rosso theatre, large crowds were trying to get in to watch the live sex shows from red velvet seats. A few hundred yards down the street, an erotic museum was also busy. 'It is not reasonable,' shouted Joshua Saley, an 18-year-old on holiday from Woking. 'This is a place where you can be yourself.' His friend, Michael Bailey, said: 'The one place on Earth where you are allowed to do what you want.'
Beside them a tour group headed away from the canal towards another part of the district. Led by their guide, Chantal Moreno, a 28-year-old woman who takes tourists around the area three times a week, they stared in shock at the women beckoning them towards the windows.
Yep. Women in windows -- women for sale. Sex for a price. Prostitution on parade as a life-style choice, an unvirtuous man's dream come true. Not only is the sex-trade legal, and taxed, but the whole atmosphere has been packaged and put up for sale in thematic trinkets and gizmos:
For 14 years, [Mariska] Majoor has run the [Prostitution Information Centre] in order to support women in the area and inform tourists about prostitution in the Netherlands. It is also a souvenir shop with mini statues, T-shirts, mugs, paintings and key-rings. The tourists soon noticed, however, that in place of the models of buses or buildings were those of shapely women in high-heeled boots, leaning against images of the city's famous lampposts.
A huge mural, stretching from the floor to the ceiling, covered one wall, depicting scenes of women in windows. The image was painted by Majoor's father. 'It is his way of dealing with it,' she said. Close by, he had also painted a wooden folding screen with pictures of women dressed in lingerie with their faces lit by a warm red light.
So the men can "deal with it" by marketing it, enjoying the women who work on their backs, and counting the money that makes the town prosper. But lo, what is happening? Crime has crept in?
Last week, the city announced that it would be closing down a third of its famed brothels. Within a matter of months, 52 of the iconic window displays that line the streets of the busy red-light district will disappear.
In a deal worth £18m, officials will buy 18 buildings from [Charlie] Geerts - known as Amsterdam's Emperor of Sex - and close down the 'windows'. The final decision came from the city's mayor, Job Cohen, who argued that the brothels were attracting crime and money-laundering to the area. 'We want to get rid of the underlying criminality,' he told a TV station last week.
"Emperor of sex." An antihero, another contemptable soul using women for his own gain. Who would have ever guessed that prostitution would draw crime! I thought the premise was that legalisation by its very nature made crime disappear. How could this be? Vice breeds vice? Darkness spreads its own shadow? And through it all, Geerts has made cool millions, the town is raking in the tourist revenues, busloads of young fellows like Joshua are salivating and snapping pics, and Majoor and her dad are selling key rings to help the local women get by. Anything wrong with this picture?
Comments
“People have realized that the complete removal of the feminine element from the Christian message is a shortcoming from an anthropological viewpoint. It is theologically and anthropologically important for woman to be at the center of Christianity."
This is just another of the unintended consequences of the cultural acceptance of contraception and abortion! Men's sexuality has been robbed of its creative essence. It is now viewed as something that imposes a burden on women (when conception happens to occur), something used to control women or something that is purely recreational. Why would men bother?? In taking away their responsibility, we've also robbed them of their significance! In the big picture of humanity, men have been made into nothing more than a nuisance women have to figure out how to control in order to bring about the next generation. Men don't see it as their task to protect the vulnerable because they see themselves as the vulnerable ones. A few well preserved vials of sperm would make men entirely obsolete in the world's ethos today!!
That is astounding Robin, and good for you for standing up. At the heart of that matter, I think, is even worse than a gender mixing message. There is an increased sharper and sharper focus on the "self." Solid Catholic teaching returns our focus away from ourselves to Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The original sin, Eve denied her womanhood when she desired to be like "gods." Since the only god she knew was the Father. Where was Adam? He stood impotent... in other words, they were divorced. There's a young girl at Robin's son's high school who was just told that she is the center of the universe and it's a tragic disservice to her.
Ditto what Mary said! A lot of high schools have very poor math and science depts, for boys and girls. I also am educated as a chemical engineer, but chose to teach the two years before we had children because its hours were more suited to spending time with children. (I was looking ahead). When it came time and I was pregnant with our first, I realized that I did not want to leave him with someone else, and was able to stay home full time. I am not sure it would have been that easy if we were used to another engineering income and not just a private school teacher income. Also some of my first job offers were out on oil rigs - I had no interest in that at all even though I enjoyed my engineering classes and did well in them. No one discouraged me from an engineering job, on the contrary I got a lot of flack for my decision not to pursue an engineering career.
I've been lurking, but this is one that irritates me. Beats the heck out of me what these "barriers" are. I was educated as a chemical engineer, where 1/3 of our class was women. However, in electrical engineering, only 1 or 2 out of 30 were women. Is it possible that women are Just Not Interested in some areas? Nah, it must be The Man keeping us down so we must legislate (and, I agree -- when they say "legistlate", I hear "quota"). And actually, I have a friend that was also a chemical engineer. When she lost her job, she decided not to go back into engineering and started working from home so she could spend more time with her 3 kids. Also, if nothing else, there are all kinds of incentives for women to enter science and engineering -- scholarships not available to men, guaranteed housing on campuses that do not guarantee housing to the general population, etc. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said that schools in general are not preparing students for the hard sciences. It is truly a sad state of affairs, the lack of science education these days.